Pirate Party Germany Enters Fourth State Parliament

Last sunday, the Pirate Party Germany reached another milestone. With 7.8 percent of the vote, 20 pirates are entering the parliament of Germany’s most populous state, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). The Pirate Party is now present in four of Germany’s 16 states, having scored well above 5 percent in every election since the Berlin elections in September 2011. The 20 delegates make up the largest Pirate parliamentary group to date.

Campaign poster "Education can't be cheap"

Aside from their trademark topics of civil liberties, freedom of information and transparency of the state, one of the most important campaign topics for the Pirates of NRW was proposing an educational system that will allow all students to be taught at the same schools where they can progress through a flexible course system at their individual pace. The new style of politics that many voters expect from the Pirate Party could already be witnessed on monday, as the new parliamentary group got together for its first meeting, which was streamed live to the internet and collaboratively documented in a pirate pad.

Campaign Poster "Rights to creators and consumers"

The Pirate Party NRW will be an opposition party, as the Social Democrats and the Green Party will be renewing their coalition. They had been governing North Rhine-Westphalia as a minority government since 2010, but were unable to pass a budget, which led to the 2012 re-elections. Social Democrats and Greens now have a solid majority of 128 to 109 seats. Members of the new Pirate parliamentary group have already announced that they are willing to support individual policies of the government coalition, whenever they are in accordance with the Pirate Party’s platform. They are determined to respect the MP’s freedom to vote according to their own conscience and foster a political culture that makes minority governments and changing majorities more feasible, as they are still very rare in Germany’s political system.

Greens now have a solid majority of 128 to 109 seats. Members of the new Pirate parliamentary group have already announced that they are willing to support individual policies of the government coalition, whenever they are in accordance with the Pirate Party’s platform. They are determined to respect the MP’s freedom to vote according to their own conscience and foster a political culture that makes minority governments and changing majorities more feasible, as they are still very rare in Germany’s political system.

seat distribution of the parliament in NRW

Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Party had its worst election result to date in NRW, going from 34.6 percent in 2010 to just 26.3 percent in 2012. The disastrous result led Merkel to fire environment minister Norbert Röttgen who had been leading the Christian Democrats in NRW. If the national coalition of Christian Democrats and Free Democrats survives for the rest of the term, the Pirates will be looking at national elections in September 2013. While a lot may still happen in the meantime, the results from NRW as well as national polls that see the Pirates at about 10 percent, are reason to be optimistic.

Riksdagsrösten – statistik om riksdagen på nätet

En av de verktyg som jag använder nästan jämt för att hålla koll på mitt och andras arbete här nere i Bryssel är VoteWatch.EU. Det är en sida som aggregerar information om vad vi parlamentariker gjort – inlägg i plenum, skriftliga frågor, vart vi varit föredraganden och vilka förändringsförslag vi lagt och till vilka rapporter.

Idag fick jag kännedom om ett liknande svenskt projekt: Riksdagsrösten. Projektet är förhållandevis nytt, ämnar till att aggregera och på ett enkelt sätt framställa röstdata och statistik över svenska riksdagsledamöters arbete och har ännu inte stöd från Europas största sponsorer i IKT-volontärsarbete, men söker ekonomiskt stöd.

Gå in och stöd dem nu – det har jag gjort!

Den som följer mina resonemang på flashback (inlägg 75 och framåt ungefär) vet att jag visserligen förhåller mig sunt skeptisk till statistiska mätdata som sådana – siffror kan vara missvisande. Det behöver till exempel inte vara ett tecken på politisk framgång att man som riksdagsledamot lämnat in fler motioner än andra riksdagsledamöter. Det viktigaste är och måste få vara att motionerna har en realistisk möjlighet att göra skillnad.

Men att offentliggöra och analysera mätdatan är ändå ett bra sätt att återknyta till individuella parlamentariker – vem är det som drar i vilka trådar och när? Vilka parlamentariker arbetar kvantitativt, och vilka arbetar kvalitativt? Vilka arbetar inte alls? Sådan och mycket annan information brukar jag försöka plocka upp från VoteWatch, som snabbt blivit mitt verktyg of choice utöver parlamentets egna sidor (som inte katalogiserar per ledamot, utan snarare per utskott).

Här ser ni Riksdagsrösten själva presentera sitt projekt:

Ni kan även följa projektet på twitter: @riksdagsrosten

2000 gather for Pirate Party Germany national assembly

Last month, the northern German town of Neumünster saw well over 1500 pirates, as well as hundreds of press representatives and guests gather for the Pirate Party Germany’s national assembly, making it the largest gathering in the history of the party. Since entering the Berlin state parliament in late 2011, the Pirate Party Germany (PP-DE) has not only doubled in size, but has also started raising international attention. From the perspective of international Pirate Parties that are just starting out, the challenges faced by PP-DE in terms of ensuring equal participation of its 28,000 members are worth a closer look.

Pirates vote at the national assembly

Pirates vote at the national assembly (CC-by-sa Ben de Biel)

Ensuring participation in times of exponential growth

The PP-DE’s bi-annual national assemblies are the key events in its organizational structure and the highest authority in the party. Unlike all other major German parties, every single member is allowed to attend the assembly and to vote. Between 5 and 10 percent of all members usually exercise this right. Finding a large enough venue and financing an event of that size is becoming increasingly difficult.

A lively debate over possible solutions to this problem has largely rejected the idea of a delegate system. Pirates want to make use of technology to ensure the possibility of direct participation of all members. However, the German party law forbids online assemblies as they are exercised in Pirate Parties in other countries, as secret and secure elections for the board cannot be ensured when people vote from home via the internet.

The emerging solution is to have an assembly in several venues across the nation at the same time, connected via live stream. All members will still have to attend at one of the locations and vote in person. The results will be added up electronically, but each vote will have a paper trail. This model will be tested at the next national assembly in november, which will take place in two separate locations in the city of Bochum. The success of this project will be critical to continuing the PP-DE’s standard of direct democracy.

National board elected

While the last assembly six months ago focused on the party’s political platform, this weekend was dedicated to electing a new national board. Although the platform of the PP-DE is collaboratively created and decided upon by all members, the national board has considerable power in determining the strategy of the party by representing it in the media, making financial decisions and organizing administrative work.

Former vice-chairman Bernd Schlömer beat two other promising candidates for the chair: Former chairman Sebastian Nerz and Julia Schramm. 41-year-old Bernd Schlömer is seen as a unifying figure, having served on the board for three years and enjoying broad support from the party’s members.

Nerz and Schramm are more controversial: the former because of his relatively critical stance on the party’s opinion formation tool LiquidFeedback and his disagreements with the Berlin state parliamentary group, the latter for her public criticism of the strict German data protection laws, which she deemed somewhat detrimental to the free flow of information on the internet. The fact that both of them are among the other eight board members elected in Neumünster goes to show, however, that the party is hardly divided into camps and the personal positions of board members are still secondary to their ability to communicate the party’s political platform.

the board

The board. Top: Klaus Peukert, Sebastian Nerz, Bernd Schlömer, Markus Barenhoff, Matthias Schrade. Bottom: Sven Schomaker, Julia Schramm, Swanhild Goetze, Johannes Ponader (CC-by-sa Piratenpartei Deutschland)

Prague declaration on Pirate Party Europe ratified

Among the internationally significant decisions of the weekend was PP-DE’s ratification of the Prague declaration authored by pirates from all over the Europe at the Pirate Parties International Conference two weeks earlier. The signatories agree to include a common election program in their platforms for the EP elections in 2014, to coordinate their campaigns, and to establish a Pirate Party of Europe. The ratification was welcomed by guests from international Pirate Parties that attended the assembly. Board member Julia Schramm has made it her goal to help facilitate broad transnational participation in writing the common election program.

Rick Falkvinge speaking at the PP-DE national assembly

Piratpartiet founder Rick Falkvinge speaking at the PP-DE national assembly (CC-by-sa Ben de Biel)

United against racism

The national assembly brought a close to a widely publicized debate: Following the success of PP-DE over the last couple of years, the party had attracted a few people with fringe right-wing positions who sought to find a place in the party known for its strong stance on freedom of speech and the pluralism of its members. While their ideologies found no basis whatsoever in the Pirate Party’s progressive and international platform, some people argued that PP-DE would have to tolerate those few members’ opinions within the party on the grounds of freedom of speech.

The pirates gathered in Neumünster agreed almost unanimously that racist and anti-Semitic hate speech has no room in the party. To the extent that such statements do not impinge on other people’s rights or constitute denial of the Holocaust, they are rightly protected by freedom of speech – a right that protects one from criminal prosecution. Freedom of speech does not, however, protect from criticism. A party, that has by definition agreed on a more narrow set of values than society at large, can very well protect freedom of speech as a human right, while leaving no room for racism in its own ranks. PP-DE has made it very clear that it will not serve as a platform for inhuman ideologies, but will work towards a society that judges all people on the content of their character alone.

Pirates gather in front of a banner that reads "no room for racism" (CC-by Tobias M. Eckrich)

Are we sure we need independent experts?

 

As my political awareness has been increasing I have realised how important it is to have independent experts. Whenever you go deep into a controversial, political issue, at one more or less quick moment, often the crucial  question that comes to your mind is:  do we have independent experts we can rely on to tell us what comes the closest to the truth and therefore can help us defining what action we should take to solve the problem?

The European Union, of course, agree with this view and have created EU independent bodies of experts in various areas that are serious and respected. One of them is the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS).

 As it is stated in its constitutive legislation, voted by the EU in 2001: ”With respect to the processing of personal data, the European Data Protection Supervisor shall be responsible for ensuring that the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, and in particular their right to privacy, are respected by the Community institutions and bodies”.

Since 2010, twice the EDPS have expressed concerns about the effects of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) on our fundamental rights. Its latest opinion dates back from the end of April.

If an expert body, recognised and supported by our EU institutions, assesses on two separate occasions that ACTA is a risk for our fundamental rights, I feel inclined to take this assessment into consideration, and I am sure many of my fellow EU-citizens would follow the same logic.

Therefore, I am astonished and even worried by the statement made by the European Commission representative at the European Parliament’ committee for Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on 26 April, to comment on the EDPS opinion on ACTA. It rejects the EDPS’s ”wrong” conclusions, on the ground that they are based on ”erroneous assumptions” and ”selective analysis” (watch the debate from 11:48:48 from the presentation of the EDPS opinion and the reply of the European Commission representative from 12:13:00).

How can the European Commission explain how it was able to communicate that the EDPS’s concerns about the impact of the agreement on fundamental rights are ”wrong”, while at the same time having submitted the agreement to the European Court of Justice because it needs to know whether ACTA is indeed compliant with fundamental rights? 

Also, the European Commission checks that the Member States have similar independent data protection authorities, whose expertise they should acknowledge. But here it seems the Commission does not consider in its priority to follow the independent authority they themselves have at their disposal… This weakens the position of the institutional framework the European Commission is proposing for the Member States and thereby undermines their own ambitions in data protection.

The EU should show the right way, be exemplary to its citizens, and if not at least show some logics in its way of being able to assess whether a future law (ACTA) is right or not. By undermining the EDPS expert’s voice, the European Commission representative at that particular meeting did not do so. His statement, according to the European Commission, is not its official position. ”You are damn’ right!” and we will help making sure it will never be.

SHARING: Culture and the Economy in the Internet Age

This upcoming Tuesday, 15th of May, Ms Amelia´s Andersdotter´s office is organising a book launch inside the European Parliament. The book ´SHARING: Culture and the Economy in the Internet Age´ is written by a Net culture scholar Philippe Aigrain, with contributions from his daughter, Suzanne Aigrain. As the title of the book suggests, it describes file sharing of digital cultural works between individuals, and attempts to address the real challenges facing culture in a digital world. The books sets out the conditions necessary for valuable cultural functions to remain sustainable in this context. It very much tackles the sometimes controversial topics in a high detail that Pirate Party advocates; it’s very much at the forefront of technological progress, and a brilliant introduction into emerging digital economy structure. As European Commission representative said in ITRE committee, which Ms Amelia is a full member of, ”we are living through the Third Industrial Revolution”. So please feel free to download your free copy of the book, and provide you input and views of the future digital economy